IP/EA Estimator
Properties |
Notes |
|---|---|
Ionization Potential (IP) and Electron Affinity (EA) in solid-state |
recommended |
Workflow
We make the estimation of the solid-state IP/EA of the embedded molecules using:
where:
\(IP_{GW}^{vac}\) and \(EA_{GW}^{vac}\) are the negative of GW HOMO and LUMO.
\(P^{+}_{DFT}\) and \(P^-_{DFT}\) is the DFT-level polarization energies.
Below, more details are given on how every of these quantities is computed in practice.
Polarization Energies
Polarization energies are derived from gas-phase (vacuum) \(IP^{vac}_{DFT}\)/\(EA^{vac}_{DFT}\) and COSMO calculations. The latter serve as the estimation for the solid-state IP and EA, referred to as \(IP_{COSMO}\) and \(EA_{COSMO}\). The difference between both are polarization energies at a DFT level:
The mentioned \(IP_{DFT}^{vac/COSMO}/EA_{DFT}^{vac/COSMO}\) are computed as the difference between the cation/anion energy and the neutral molecule energy in vacuum or implicit solvent (COSMO model), respectively:
In these last formulas we omitted indices (\(^{vac/COSMO}\) and \(_{DFT}\)) for brevity.
Vacuum IP and EA from GW Calculations
\(IP_{GW}^{vac}\) and \(EA_{GW}^{vac}\) are computed from many-body perturbation theory using the \(G_0W_0\) approximation on top of PBE0 (i.e., \(G_0W_0\) @ \(\text{PBE0}\)). \(G_0W_0\) slow basis set convergence is a well-known. We thus first perform calculations using two correlation-consistent basis sets:
aug-cc-pVDZ (DZ)
aug-cc-pVTZ (TZ),
and then extrapolate it to the complete basis set (CBS) limit using the cardinal number \(N\), assuming a convergence behavior of:
where:
\(E(N)\) is the computed IP or EA using the basis set of cardinal number \(N\),
\(E(\infty)\) is the extrapolated energy at the CBS limit,
\(A\) is a constant that is determined along with \(E(\infty)\) because \(E(N)\) is known for two different \(N\), in our case 2(DZ) and 3(DZ).
Nanomatch Software |
Scientific Role |
Illustration |
|---|---|---|
Ground State
Geometry optimization
|
|
|
IP in vacuum (DFT)
|
|
|
EA in vacuum (DFT)
|
|
|
IP in medium (COSMO)
|
|
|
EA in medium (COSMO)
|
|
|
HOMO and LUMO (GW)
|
|
|
IP/EA Analysis |
Compute IP and EA as:
\(\mathrm{IP} = -\mathrm{HOMO}_\mathrm{GW} - P^+_\mathrm{DFT}\)
\(\mathrm{EA} = -\mathrm{LUMO}_\mathrm{GW} + P^-_\mathrm{DFT}\)
|
|
Implemented Scientific Methods
Step |
Method |
|---|---|
Ground-State Geometry Optimization |
DFT, B3LYP/def2-SVP |
DFT Single Point Calculations (vacuum / COSMO) |
DFT, BP86/def2-SVPD |
GW Calculations in complete basis set limit |
G₀W₀@PBE0/(aug-cc-pVDZ, aug-cc-pVTZ) |
Software:
Output
Displayed Results
The data below will be displayed as the workflow ends (backend name: result.yml):
QLQHAHDIYGVQJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N:
EA:
results:
EA in eV: 2.5607947915471554
LUMO_vacuum in eV: -1.6542377032731708
P_minus in eV: 0.9065570882739848
value: 2.5607947915471554
IP:
results:
HOMO_vacuum in eV: -6.784890425832648
IP in eV: 5.928143563226561
P_plus in eV: 0.8567468626060872
value: 5.928143563226561
Here, not only computed estimated solid-state EA/IP estimators are saved (EA/IP), but also the quantities used to calculate them:
EA/IPare the solid-state values of the IP and EA.P_plusandP_minusare cation and anion polarization energies, respectively.HOMO_vacuumandLUMO_vacuumare computed in vacuum with GW method.
Files
In addition to parsed output, the following file are available upon the workflow completion:
No. |
File |
Description |
|---|---|---|
1 |
Molecule_opt.mol2 |
Ground State geometry in MOL2 format |
Benchmark
Benchmark set:
Molecule Names:
NPD
BFDPB
BPAPF
TCTA
Verification
We compare the polarization energies \(P+\) computed with this calculator to the values computed using explicit solvent model, QuantumPatch [1] as shown below:
The deviation between the reference (QuantumPatch) and the given method does not exceed 50 meV.


